Dominant Strategy : Hold
Time series to forecast n: 26 Feb 2023 for (n+1 year)
Methodology : Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer)
Abstract
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer) and Multiple Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the LON:AXS stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: HoldKey Points
- Market Signals
- What are the most successful trading algorithms?
- Fundemental Analysis with Algorithmic Trading
LON:AXS Target Price Prediction Modeling Methodology
We consider ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC Decision Process with Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer) where A is the set of discrete actions of LON:AXS stock holders, F is the set of discrete states, P : S × F × S → R is the transition probability distribution, R : S × F → R is the reaction function, and γ ∈ [0, 1] is a move factor for expectation.1,2,3,4
F(Multiple Regression)5,6,7= X R(Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer)) X S(n):→ (n+1 year)
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of LON:AXS stock
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move
a:Best response for target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do AC Investment Research machine learning (predictive) algorithms actually work?
LON:AXS Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) for (n+1 year)
Sample Set: Neural NetworkStock/Index: LON:AXS ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Time series to forecast n: 26 Feb 2023 for (n+1 year)
According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments for ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
- An entity is not required to restate prior periods to reflect the application of these amendments. The entity may restate prior periods if, and only if, it is possible without the use of hindsight. If an entity does not restate prior periods, the entity shall recognise any difference between the previous carrying amount and the carrying amount at the beginning of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application of these amendments in the opening retained earnings (or other component of equity, as appropriate) of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application of these amendments.
- If an entity measures a hybrid contract at fair value in accordance with paragraphs 4.1.2A, 4.1.4 or 4.1.5 but the fair value of the hybrid contract had not been measured in comparative reporting periods, the fair value of the hybrid contract in the comparative reporting periods shall be the sum of the fair values of the components (ie the non-derivative host and the embedded derivative) at the end of each comparative reporting period if the entity restates prior periods (see paragraph 7.2.15).
- An entity shall assess separately whether each subgroup meets the requirements in paragraph 6.6.1 to be an eligible hedged item. If any subgroup fails to meet the requirements in paragraph 6.6.1, the entity shall discontinue hedge accounting prospectively for the hedging relationship in its entirety. An entity also shall apply the requirements in paragraphs 6.5.8 and 6.5.11 to account for ineffectiveness related to the hedging relationship in its entirety.
- When an entity discontinues measuring the financial instrument that gives rise to the credit risk, or a proportion of that financial instrument, at fair value through profit or loss, that financial instrument's fair value at the date of discontinuation becomes its new carrying amount. Subsequently, the same measurement that was used before designating the financial instrument at fair value through profit or loss shall be applied (including amortisation that results from the new carrying amount). For example, a financial asset that had originally been classified as measured at amortised cost would revert to that measurement and its effective interest rate would be recalculated based on its new gross carrying amount on the date of discontinuing measurement at fair value through profit or loss.
*International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adjustment process involves reviewing the company's financial statements and identifying any differences between the company's current accounting practices and the requirements of the IFRS. If there are any such differences, neural network makes adjustments to financial statements to bring them into compliance with the IFRS.
Conclusions
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating. ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer) and Multiple Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the LON:AXS stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
LON:AXS ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC Financial Analysis*
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook* | Ba1 | Ba1 |
Income Statement | Baa2 | B1 |
Balance Sheet | Baa2 | Baa2 |
Leverage Ratios | Baa2 | Ba1 |
Cash Flow | Caa2 | Baa2 |
Rates of Return and Profitability | Baa2 | Caa2 |
*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
Prediction Confidence Score

References
- Cheung, Y. M.D. Chinn (1997), "Further investigation of the uncertain unit root in GNP," Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15, 68–73.
- Candès E, Tao T. 2007. The Dantzig selector: statistical estimation when p is much larger than n. Ann. Stat. 35:2313–51
- Athey S. 2017. Beyond prediction: using big data for policy problems. Science 355:483–85
- Athey S, Imbens G, Wager S. 2016a. Efficient inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions via approximate residual balancing. arXiv:1604.07125 [math.ST]
- Barrett, C. B. (1997), "Heteroscedastic price forecasting for food security management in developing countries," Oxford Development Studies, 25, 225–236.
- K. Boda, J. Filar, Y. Lin, and L. Spanjers. Stochastic target hitting time and the problem of early retirement. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 49(3):409–419, 2004
- D. Bertsekas and J. Tsitsiklis. Neuro-dynamic programming. Athena Scientific, 1996.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the prediction methodology for LON:AXS stock?A: LON:AXS stock prediction methodology: We evaluate the prediction models Modular Neural Network (CNN Layer) and Multiple Regression
Q: Is LON:AXS stock a buy or sell?
A: The dominant strategy among neural network is to Hold LON:AXS Stock.
Q: Is ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC stock a good investment?
A: The consensus rating for ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC is Hold and is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.
Q: What is the consensus rating of LON:AXS stock?
A: The consensus rating for LON:AXS is Hold.
Q: What is the prediction period for LON:AXS stock?
A: The prediction period for LON:AXS is (n+1 year)
People also ask
⚐ What are the top stocks to invest in right now?☵ What happens to stocks when they're delisted?