**Outlook:**Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.

**Dominant Strategy :**Hold

**Time series to forecast n: 06 Feb 2023**for (n+16 weeks)

**Methodology :**Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer)

## Abstract

Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer) and Pearson Correlation^{1,2,3,4}and it is concluded that the WDS stock is predictable in the short/long term.

**According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold**

## Key Points

- Prediction Modeling
- Game Theory
- What is Markov decision process in reinforcement learning?

## WDS Target Price Prediction Modeling Methodology

We consider Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share Decision Process with Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer) where A is the set of discrete actions of WDS stock holders, F is the set of discrete states, P : S × F × S → R is the transition probability distribution, R : S × F → R is the reaction function, and γ ∈ [0, 1] is a move factor for expectation.^{1,2,3,4}

F(Pearson Correlation)

^{5,6,7}= $\begin{array}{cccc}{p}_{\mathrm{a}1}& {p}_{\mathrm{a}2}& \dots & {p}_{1n}\\ & \vdots \\ {p}_{j1}& {p}_{j2}& \dots & {p}_{jn}\\ & \vdots \\ {p}_{k1}& {p}_{k2}& \dots & {p}_{kn}\\ & \vdots \\ {p}_{n1}& {p}_{n2}& \dots & {p}_{nn}\end{array}$ X R(Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer)) X S(n):→ (n+16 weeks) $\begin{array}{l}\int {e}^{x}\mathrm{rx}\end{array}$

n:Time series to forecast

p:Price signals of WDS stock

j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)

k:Dominated move

a:Best response for target price

For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:

How do AC Investment Research machine learning (predictive) algorithms actually work?

## WDS Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) for (n+16 weeks)

**Sample Set:**Neural Network

**Stock/Index:**WDS Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share

**Time series to forecast n: 06 Feb 2023**for (n+16 weeks)

**According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold**

**X axis: *Likelihood%** (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)

**Y axis: *Potential Impact%** (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)

**Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%**

## IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments for Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share

- If the holder cannot assess the conditions in paragraph B4.1.21 at initial recognition, the tranche must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. If the underlying pool of instruments can change after initial recognition in such a way that the pool may not meet the conditions in paragraphs B4.1.23–B4.1.24, the tranche does not meet the conditions in paragraph B4.1.21 and must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. However, if the underlying pool includes instruments that are collateralised by assets that do not meet the conditions in paragraphs B4.1.23–B4.1.24, the ability to take possession of such assets shall be disregarded for the purposes of applying this paragraph unless the entity acquired the tranche with the intention of controlling the collateral.
- An entity may use practical expedients when measuring expected credit losses if they are consistent with the principles in paragraph 5.5.17. An example of a practical expedient is the calculation of the expected credit losses on trade receivables using a provision matrix. The entity would use its historical credit loss experience (adjusted as appropriate in accordance with paragraphs B5.5.51–B5.5.52) for trade receivables to estimate the 12-month expected credit losses or the lifetime expected credit losses on the financial assets as relevant. A provision matrix might, for example, specify fixed provision rates depending on the number of days that a trade receivable is past due (for example, 1 per cent if not past due, 2 per cent if less than 30 days past due, 3 per cent if more than 30 days but less than 90 days past due, 20 per cent if 90–180 days past due etc). Depending on the diversity of its customer base, the entity would use appropriate groupings if its historical credit loss experience shows significantly different loss patterns for different customer segments. Examples of criteria that might be used to group assets include geographical region, product type, customer rating, collateral or trade credit insurance and type of customer (such as wholesale or retail)
- An entity that first applies these amendments at the same time it first applies this Standard shall apply paragraphs 7.2.1–7.2.28 instead of paragraphs 7.2.31–7.2.34.
- A contractually specified inflation risk component of the cash flows of a recognised inflation-linked bond (assuming that there is no requirement to account for an embedded derivative separately) is separately identifiable and reliably measurable, as long as other cash flows of the instrument are not affected by the inflation risk component.

*International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adjustment process involves reviewing the company's financial statements and identifying any differences between the company's current accounting practices and the requirements of the IFRS. If there are any such differences, neural network makes adjustments to financial statements to bring them into compliance with the IFRS.

## Conclusions

Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating. Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer) and Pearson Correlation^{1,2,3,4} and it is concluded that the WDS stock is predictable in the short/long term. ** According to price forecasts for (n+16 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold**

### WDS Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share Financial Analysis*

Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|

Outlook* | Ba1 | Ba1 |

Income Statement | Caa2 | Ba1 |

Balance Sheet | C | Baa2 |

Leverage Ratios | B3 | B2 |

Cash Flow | B1 | B3 |

Rates of Return and Profitability | C | Caa2 |

*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.

How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?

### Prediction Confidence Score

## References

- P. Milgrom and I. Segal. Envelope theorems for arbitrary choice sets. Econometrica, 70(2):583–601, 2002
- J. Filar, L. Kallenberg, and H. Lee. Variance-penalized Markov decision processes. Mathematics of Opera- tions Research, 14(1):147–161, 1989
- R. Sutton, D. McAllester, S. Singh, and Y. Mansour. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12, pages 1057–1063, 2000
- Chernozhukov V, Demirer M, Duflo E, Fernandez-Val I. 2018b. Generic machine learning inference on heteroge- nous treatment effects in randomized experiments. NBER Work. Pap. 24678
- Çetinkaya, A., Zhang, Y.Z., Hao, Y.M. and Ma, X.Y., Trading Signals (WTS Stock Forecast). AC Investment Research Journal, 101(3).
- N. B ̈auerle and J. Ott. Markov decision processes with average-value-at-risk criteria. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 74(3):361–379, 2011
- K. Tumer and D. Wolpert. A survey of collectives. In K. Tumer and D. Wolpert, editors, Collectives and the Design of Complex Systems, pages 1–42. Springer, 2004.

## Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the prediction methodology for WDS stock?A: WDS stock prediction methodology: We evaluate the prediction models Modular Neural Network (DNN Layer) and Pearson Correlation

Q: Is WDS stock a buy or sell?

A: The dominant strategy among neural network is to Hold WDS Stock.

Q: Is Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share stock a good investment?

A: The consensus rating for Woodside Energy Group Limited American Depositary Shares each representing one Ordinary Share is Hold and is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.

Q: What is the consensus rating of WDS stock?

A: The consensus rating for WDS is Hold.

Q: What is the prediction period for WDS stock?

A: The prediction period for WDS is (n+16 weeks)