Dominant Strategy : Sell
Time series to forecast n: 29 May 2023 for (n+4 weeks)
Methodology : Transfer Learning (ML)
Abstract
MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED prediction model is evaluated with Transfer Learning (ML) and Lasso Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the MRG stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+4 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: SellKey Points
- Is Target price a good indicator?
- How do you know when a stock will go up or down?
- Why do we need predictive models?
MRG Target Price Prediction Modeling Methodology
We consider MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED Decision Process with Transfer Learning (ML) where A is the set of discrete actions of MRG stock holders, F is the set of discrete states, P : S × F × S → R is the transition probability distribution, R : S × F → R is the reaction function, and γ ∈ [0, 1] is a move factor for expectation.1,2,3,4
F(Lasso Regression)5,6,7= X R(Transfer Learning (ML)) X S(n):→ (n+4 weeks)
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of MRG stock
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move
a:Best response for target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do AC Investment Research machine learning (predictive) algorithms actually work?
MRG Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) for (n+4 weeks)
Sample Set: Neural NetworkStock/Index: MRG MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED
Time series to forecast n: 29 May 2023 for (n+4 weeks)
According to price forecasts for (n+4 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Sell
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments for MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED
- An entity shall apply Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation (Amendments to IFRS 9) retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8, except as specified in paragraphs 7.2.30–7.2.34
- For the purpose of recognising foreign exchange gains and losses under IAS 21, a financial asset measured at fair value through other comprehensive income in accordance with paragraph 4.1.2A is treated as a monetary item. Accordingly, such a financial asset is treated as an asset measured at amortised cost in the foreign currency. Exchange differences on the amortised cost are recognised in profit or loss and other changes in the carrying amount are recognised in accordance with paragraph 5.7.10.
- The expected credit losses on a loan commitment shall be discounted using the effective interest rate, or an approximation thereof, that will be applied when recognising the financial asset resulting from the loan commitment. This is because for the purpose of applying the impairment requirements, a financial asset that is recognised following a draw down on a loan commitment shall be treated as a continuation of that commitment instead of as a new financial instrument. The expected credit losses on the financial asset shall therefore be measured considering the initial credit risk of the loan commitment from the date that the entity became a party to the irrevocable commitment.
- An entity can rebut this presumption. However, it can do so only when it has reasonable and supportable information available that demonstrates that even if contractual payments become more than 30 days past due, this does not represent a significant increase in the credit risk of a financial instrument. For example when non-payment was an administrative oversight, instead of resulting from financial difficulty of the borrower, or the entity has access to historical evidence that demonstrates that there is no correlation between significant increases in the risk of a default occurring and financial assets on which payments are more than 30 days past due, but that evidence does identify such a correlation when payments are more than 60 days past due.
*International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adjustment process involves reviewing the company's financial statements and identifying any differences between the company's current accounting practices and the requirements of the IFRS. If there are any such differences, neural network makes adjustments to financial statements to bring them into compliance with the IFRS.
Conclusions
MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating. MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED prediction model is evaluated with Transfer Learning (ML) and Lasso Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the MRG stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+4 weeks) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Sell
MRG MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED Financial Analysis*
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook* | Ba1 | Ba1 |
Income Statement | Baa2 | B3 |
Balance Sheet | Baa2 | B3 |
Leverage Ratios | B3 | B2 |
Cash Flow | B2 | Baa2 |
Rates of Return and Profitability | B2 | Baa2 |
*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
Prediction Confidence Score

References
- Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J. 2013a. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:1301.3781 [cs.CL]
- Kitagawa T, Tetenov A. 2015. Who should be treated? Empirical welfare maximization methods for treatment choice. Tech. Rep., Cent. Microdata Methods Pract., Inst. Fiscal Stud., London
- Babula, R. A. (1988), "Contemporaneous correlation and modeling Canada's imports of U.S. crops," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 41, 33–38.
- Bottomley, P. R. Fildes (1998), "The role of prices in models of innovation diffusion," Journal of Forecasting, 17, 539–555.
- Semenova V, Goldman M, Chernozhukov V, Taddy M. 2018. Orthogonal ML for demand estimation: high dimensional causal inference in dynamic panels. arXiv:1712.09988 [stat.ML]
- M. Ono, M. Pavone, Y. Kuwata, and J. Balaram. Chance-constrained dynamic programming with application to risk-aware robotic space exploration. Autonomous Robots, 39(4):555–571, 2015
- Hartigan JA, Wong MA. 1979. Algorithm as 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 28:100–8
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the prediction methodology for MRG stock?A: MRG stock prediction methodology: We evaluate the prediction models Transfer Learning (ML) and Lasso Regression
Q: Is MRG stock a buy or sell?
A: The dominant strategy among neural network is to Sell MRG Stock.
Q: Is MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED stock a good investment?
A: The consensus rating for MURRAY RIVER ORGANICS GROUP LIMITED is Sell and is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.
Q: What is the consensus rating of MRG stock?
A: The consensus rating for MRG is Sell.
Q: What is the prediction period for MRG stock?
A: The prediction period for MRG is (n+4 weeks)
People also ask
⚐ What are the top stocks to invest in right now?☵ What happens to stocks when they're delisted?