Dominant Strategy : Hold
Time series to forecast n: 14 May 2023 for (n+1 year)
Methodology : Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis)
Abstract
NEARMAP LTD prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis) and Multiple Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the NEA stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: HoldKey Points
- What is Markov decision process in reinforcement learning?
- Dominated Move
- Which neural network is best for prediction?
NEA Target Price Prediction Modeling Methodology
We consider NEARMAP LTD Decision Process with Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis) where A is the set of discrete actions of NEA stock holders, F is the set of discrete states, P : S × F × S → R is the transition probability distribution, R : S × F → R is the reaction function, and γ ∈ [0, 1] is a move factor for expectation.1,2,3,4
F(Multiple Regression)5,6,7= X R(Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis)) X S(n):→ (n+1 year)
n:Time series to forecast
p:Price signals of NEA stock
j:Nash equilibria (Neural Network)
k:Dominated move
a:Best response for target price
For further technical information as per how our model work we invite you to visit the article below:
How do AC Investment Research machine learning (predictive) algorithms actually work?
NEA Stock Forecast (Buy or Sell) for (n+1 year)
Sample Set: Neural NetworkStock/Index: NEA NEARMAP LTD
Time series to forecast n: 14 May 2023 for (n+1 year)
According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
X axis: *Likelihood% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the event will occur.)
Y axis: *Potential Impact% (The higher the percentage value, the more likely the price will deviate.)
Z axis (Grey to Black): *Technical Analysis%
IFRS Reconciliation Adjustments for NEARMAP LTD
- Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018–2020, issued in May 2020, added paragraphs 7.2.35 and B3.3.6A and amended paragraph B3.3.6. An entity shall apply that amendment for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022. Earlier application is permitted. If an entity applies the amendment for an earlier period, it shall disclose that fact.
- When rebalancing a hedging relationship, an entity shall update its analysis of the sources of hedge ineffectiveness that are expected to affect the hedging relationship during its (remaining) term (see paragraph B6.4.2). The documentation of the hedging relationship shall be updated accordingly.
- In almost every lending transaction the creditor's instrument is ranked relative to the instruments of the debtor's other creditors. An instrument that is subordinated to other instruments may have contractual cash flows that are payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding if the debtor's non-payment is a breach of contract and the holder has a contractual right to unpaid amounts of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding even in the event of the debtor's bankruptcy. For example, a trade receivable that ranks its creditor as a general creditor would qualify as having payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding. This is the case even if the debtor issued loans that are collateralised, which in the event of bankruptcy would give that loan holder priority over the claims of the general creditor in respect of the collateral but does not affect the contractual right of the general creditor to unpaid principal and other amounts due.
- When using historical credit loss experience in estimating expected credit losses, it is important that information about historical credit loss rates is applied to groups that are defined in a manner that is consistent with the groups for which the historical credit loss rates were observed. Consequently, the method used shall enable each group of financial assets to be associated with information about past credit loss experience in groups of financial assets with similar risk characteristics and with relevant observable data that reflects current conditions.
*International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adjustment process involves reviewing the company's financial statements and identifying any differences between the company's current accounting practices and the requirements of the IFRS. If there are any such differences, neural network makes adjustments to financial statements to bring them into compliance with the IFRS.
Conclusions
NEARMAP LTD is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating. NEARMAP LTD prediction model is evaluated with Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis) and Multiple Regression1,2,3,4 and it is concluded that the NEA stock is predictable in the short/long term. According to price forecasts for (n+1 year) period, the dominant strategy among neural network is: Hold
NEA NEARMAP LTD Financial Analysis*
Rating | Short-Term | Long-Term Senior |
---|---|---|
Outlook* | Ba1 | Ba1 |
Income Statement | C | B1 |
Balance Sheet | Baa2 | B3 |
Leverage Ratios | B1 | C |
Cash Flow | Caa2 | C |
Rates of Return and Profitability | Ba3 | C |
*Financial analysis is the process of evaluating a company's financial performance and position by neural network. It involves reviewing the company's financial statements, including the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement, as well as other financial reports and documents.
How does neural network examine financial reports and understand financial state of the company?
Prediction Confidence Score

References
- R. Sutton and A. Barto. Introduction to reinforcement learning. MIT Press, 1998
- Li L, Chu W, Langford J, Moon T, Wang X. 2012. An unbiased offline evaluation of contextual bandit algo- rithms with generalized linear models. In Proceedings of 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 297–306. New York: ACM
- Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimat- ing the effect of California's tobacco control program. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 105:493–505
- S. Bhatnagar and K. Lakshmanan. An online actor-critic algorithm with function approximation for con- strained Markov decision processes. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 153(3):688–708, 2012.
- F. A. Oliehoek, M. T. J. Spaan, and N. A. Vlassis. Optimal and approximate q-value functions for decentralized pomdps. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 32:289–353, 2008
- J. Z. Leibo, V. Zambaldi, M. Lanctot, J. Marecki, and T. Graepel. Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2017), Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2017
- Dudik M, Langford J, Li L. 2011. Doubly robust policy evaluation and learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1097–104. La Jolla, CA: Int. Mach. Learn. Soc.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the prediction methodology for NEA stock?A: NEA stock prediction methodology: We evaluate the prediction models Modular Neural Network (Market Direction Analysis) and Multiple Regression
Q: Is NEA stock a buy or sell?
A: The dominant strategy among neural network is to Hold NEA Stock.
Q: Is NEARMAP LTD stock a good investment?
A: The consensus rating for NEARMAP LTD is Hold and is assigned short-term Ba1 & long-term Ba1 estimated rating.
Q: What is the consensus rating of NEA stock?
A: The consensus rating for NEA is Hold.
Q: What is the prediction period for NEA stock?
A: The prediction period for NEA is (n+1 year)